EU accused of making ‘idle threats’ to City banks after demanding they move jobs to the continent

The EU was accused of making ‘idle threats’ tonight after City of London banks were warned that they need to move jobs and assets to the continent to continue trading post-Brexit.

The European Central Bank (ECB) said today that UK-based financial institutions must not use the pandemic as an excuse to avoid relocation before the transition period.

The ECB, which supervises the euro zone’s biggest banks, said that lenders operating in the bloc must move sufficient capital, staff and management expertise to ensure the sort of physical presence required for prudent risk management.

‘Banking Supervision has provided flexibility where required, notably to account for the impact of the lockdown measures and travel restrictions on the relocation of staff,’ it said.

‘No additional flexibility is foreseen in principle.’

But Brexiteers tonight said that the demand was an empty threat because most banks have a presence in the eurozone already.

Tory MP Peter Bone told MailOnline: ‘Basically any big bank already has something there. There is nothing to move … that is an idle threat.

‘I’m afraid I don’t think any of our banks will take any notice because they have already done it.

It came amid the latest claims of hope for a trade deal as soon as next week. France is said to have blinked over fishing rights in UK waters – a key sticking point between the two sides.

An agreement could be made as soon as Monday, the Telegraph reported, with talks ongoing in Brussels this week.  

The European Central Bank (ECB) said today that UK-based financial institutions must not use the pandemic as an excuse to avoid relocation

Tory MP Peter Bone told MailOnline: 'Basically any big bank already has something there. There is nothing to move ... that is an idle threat'

Tory MP Peter Bone told MailOnline: ‘Basically any big bank already has something there. There is nothing to move … that is an idle threat’

Nissan, which employs 7,000 people at Britain's biggest auto plant in Sunderland, called in June for an 'orderly balanced Brexit'

Nissan, which employs 7,000 people at Britain’s biggest auto plant in Sunderland, called in June for an ‘orderly balanced Brexit’

No Deal Brexit would be an ‘organised crime bonanza’ in Ulster

Northern Ireland’s justice minister warned today that a failure to do a post-Brexit trade deal would spark a ‘organised crime bonanza’ in the country.

Naomi Long described ‘huge uncertainty’ for justice agencies with just weeks to go until the end of the transition period.

She singled out extradition as a particular area of concern, telling a Westminster committee that the justice system could be left using 1950s mechanisms for extradition.

‘We can’t combat 2020 crime and security threats using 1950 tools,’ she said.

The Northern Ireland Affairs Committee previously heard that instead of six to eight weeks under the European Arrest Warrant, extradition could take up to two years.

Giving evidence to the committee on Wednesday, Ms Long said it is ‘imperative’ that the UK and EU agree a future security partnership.

‘However even if they do, it will not have the same breadth of measures to which we currently have access, the outcome will be sub-optimal unless we have the same access to current IT systems, legal instruments and EU agencies that we currently enjoy,’ she told MPs.

‘We cannot really afford to lose those key EU measures, if we – tragically in my view – exit without a deal then it is imperative that bilateral arrangements are put in place to bridge any gaps in capability.

‘There is huge uncertainty for justice partners, there are only weeks to go until the end of the transition period yet we do not know what beyond that will look like.

‘Planning can only go so far in that context. We do now urgently need detail on the outcome of the negotiations and clarity, in particular as to how the Northern Ireland Protocol will be implemented in practice to try to embed a culture of compliance and a culture of lawfulness.’ 

It added that remote working arrangements do not change its requirement to relocate staff to the EU. 

Talks are ongoing in Brussels this week between UK negotiator Lord Frost and the EU’s Michel Barnier aimed at finding an agreement. 

Meanwhile Nissan warned this morning that failure to agree a deal would raise questions over its future in the UK.

 Ashwani Gupta, Nissan’s chief operating officer (COO), told Reuters on Wednesday that any final exit by Britain from the European Union that worsens business conditions through increased tariffs would threaten the sustainability of its British operations.

Nissan, which employs 7,000 people at Britain’s biggest auto plant in Sunderland, called in June for an ‘orderly balanced Brexit’.

But the latest warning comes as the EU cautions Britain it has fewer than 10 days left to secure a deal governing trade from next year.

‘If it happens without any sustainable business case, obviously it is not a question of Sunderland or not Sunderland, obviously our UK business will not be sustainable, that’s it,’ Mr Gupta said today.

In March, Nissan said it would push ahead with a 52-million-pound ($69 million) expansion at Sunderland to build its new Qashqai sports utility vehicle.

When it announced the plan in 2016, Nissan, which builds its Leaf electric cars there, said Britain had reassured it Brexit would not affect its competitiveness.

But tariffs resulting from a no-deal Brexit would raise costs for Nissan, while any delay in the supply of parts from overseas, because of new customs checks, could slow production.

That potential Brexit disruption to supply chains that stretch across Europe could also hurt other manufacturers, hitting an economy reeling from the coronavirus pandemic.

Mr Gupta said Nissan was not seeking compensation from Britain for costs incurred from any no-deal Brexit, contradicting media reports that it and Toyota Motor Corp would do so.

‘We are absolutely not thinking that and we are not discussing it,’ he said. ‘Our commitment remains, and it will continue as far as our business is sustainable.’

Toyota also runs a plant in the Midlands county of Derbyshire and builds engines at a factory in Wales.

Honda Motor, which builds its Civic cars in Swindon in southern England, said last year it would close its only plant in Britain with the loss of up to 3,500 jobs because of the decision to leave the EU. 

Boris Johnson was warned about the impact of the impasse on Northern Ireland today, with 43 days until the end of the transition period.

‘Countless’ businesses and communities in Northern Ireland are expressing ‘frustration, anxiety and fear’ over Brexit trading arrangements, shadow Northern Ireland secretary Lou Haigh told the Commons.

Asking an urgent question in the Commons on the Northern Ireland Protocol: Implementation preparations, she said: ‘Northern Ireland needed every second of this transition year to get ready for the biggest changes to their trading relationship it has ever known, but vital time has been squandered.

‘First denying any checks would take place at all and then the extraordinary spectacle of the Government threatening to tear up its own oven-ready deal and breach international treaties they had signed into law…

‘The result of this recklessness, this incompetence, is that thousands of businesses still do not know the bare basics of how they will trade with Great Britain in just six weeks’ time.’

Earlier this month Chancellor Rishi Sunak took a swipe at Brussels as he revealed that he was taking unilateral action to allow financial services firms from the bloc to do business in a newly sovereign Britain.

He announced he was introducing ‘equivalence’ rules and bemoaned the failure of the EU to strike a similar deal for the City despite years of talks since the 2016 referendum.

Lord Frost

Michel Barnier

Talks are ongoing in Brussels this week between UK negotiator Lord Frost and the EU’s Michel Barnier aimed at finding an agreement.

The Chancellor told MPs in the Commons that Britain would set out how it would let European Union financial services firms operate in Britain after the post-Brexit transition period ends on December 31. 

In a blunt assessment of the impasse with Brussels, he said it was now clear that there were ‘many areas’ where the EU was not prepared to even assess access to British firms.

He said that Britain would therefore make its own ‘equivalence’ rules for foreign firms – a recognition that EU supervision and regulations match those in the UK to allow companies greater operating certainty.

Fresh defeat for Boris’s Brexit legislation as Lords reject plans  that ‘brushed aside’ freedoms of devolved nations 

Peers have inflicted a further heavy defeat on Boris Johnson’s controversial Brexit legislation, amid accusations that it ‘brushed aside’ the freedoms of the devolved nations.

The House of Lords backed by 367 votes to 209, majority 158, a cross-party move to ensure the administrations in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, retained a voice and powers in the future operation of the UK internal market following the split from the EU.

The Government setback at the report stage of the Internal Market Bill followed the backlash against the Prime Minister calling Scottish devolution ‘a disaster’.

Last week, the legislation suffered two defeats in the upper house, with peers stripping out law-breaking powers that would enable ministers to override parts of the Brexit divorce deal – known as the Withdrawal Agreement – brokered with Brussels last year.

The latest change to the Bill, backed by peers, is designed to give the devolved administrations a key role in the coordination of the UK single market through so-called common frameworks, which manages the extent of divergence across policy areas.

Critics argued this cooperative process stood threatened to be bypassed by the Bill, with rules imposed centrally by the Westminster government.

Independent crossbencher Lord Hope of Craighead, who proposed the amendment, said: ‘The question was whether the devolved nations should continue to be free to develop and apply market policies within their devolution mandate, which has secured agreement under the common frameworks process, or whether that freedom should be brushed aside as this Bill really seeks to do.

‘It’s difficult to avoid the conclusion that this Government really regards devolution as an inconvenience which can simply be ignored when it wants to. I regret that very much indeed.

‘I am afraid we see here an uncompromising, care less and centralist-style of government which divides our United Kingdom into pieces at a time when harmony is most needed. That has no place in our democracy.’

Baroness Finlay of Llandaff, another independent crossbencher, said the Bill consigned the common frameworks to becoming a ‘meaningless sideshow’.

She warned that if the legislation was enacted unchanged it would bring down an ‘iron curtain’ on the ability of the devolved administrations to make a difference.

Labour former Scotland minister Lord Foulkes of Cumnock said: ‘It is better to achieve consensus through a common frameworks procedure – a procedure where agreement can be reached and if it can’t be reached there are mechanisms for resolving that.

‘Rather than the clumsy blunderbuss of the Internal Market Bill. Rushed in without consultation.’

Tory former solicitor general Lord Garnier warned that without the change to the Bill the common frameworks system was redundant and ministers would ‘encourage and even hasten the break-up of the UK’.

Liberal Democrat Baroness Randerson said: ‘This Bill strikes quite deliberately at the whole basis of devolution. It is designed to roll-back devolution and I warn the Government that their tactics are dangerous and they are playing with fire.’

Labour frontbencher Lord Stevenson of Balmacara said: ‘It can be argued that what this Bill is actually about is gathering powers which should be devolved to an insensitive centre which is trying to imprison a multinational country… into a straitjacket of a unitary state. We can and need to do better than that.’

Cabinet Office minister Lord True said: ‘The UK Government and the devolved administrations all have a clear stake in a smooth functioning internal market.

‘However, the Government has been clear… that the right place for final decisions on the internal market should be the United Kingdom Parliament, where parliamentarians from all parts of the United Kingdom can debate and vote on legislative proposals.’

He added: ‘In our judgment this broad approach to using common frameworks to disapply elements of the Bill goes too far and could lead to legal and regulatory uncertainty.’