‘Give me a f***ing break’: Audio recordings of Melania Trump are leaked by former best friend

Melania Trump has been heard saying ‘give me a f***ing break’ while talking about the criticism she received over children being separated from their parents at the US-Mexico border.

In new audio tapes released by the First Lady’s ex-best friend Stephanie Winston Wolkoff on CNN, Melania said: ‘They say I’m complicit. I’m the same like him [Trump], I support him, I don’t say enough. I don’t do enough.

‘Where I am. I put – I’m working like a – my a** off – at Christmas stuff that you know, who gives a f*** about Christmas stuff and decoration? But I need to do it, right?

‘Ok, and then I do it. And I say that I’m working on Christmas planning for the Christmas. And they said, “Oh, what about the children that they were separated?”

‘Give me a f***ing break. Where they were saying anything when Obama did that?,’ Melania fumed in the July 2018 call.

The First Lady added: ‘I cannot go. I was trying to get the kid reunited with the mom. I didn’t have a chance. Needs to go through the process and through the law.’

It is not clear which mother and child Melania is talking about but she says ‘we put it out, they would not do the story,’ referring to the press.

‘They are not, they would not do the story because they, they, they are against us, because they’re liberal media.

‘Yeh if I do to Fox, they will do the story. I don’t want to go to Fox.’  

During the same conversation, Melania appeared to tell Wolkoff that she believed the children being held in detention camps were happy to be in US custody.  

‘All these kids that I met they were, they’re here in the shelters because they were brought by it through Coyotes, the people who were trafficking – that’s why they put them in jail,’ Melania is heard saying.

‘And the kids that they go in shelters. And the way they take care of them. It’s – you know, they even said, the kids, they said “Wow I had my own bed? I will sleep on the bed. I will have a cabinet for my clothes?”‘ 

‘It’s so said to hear it. But they didn’t have that in their own countries. They’re sleeping on the floors. They are taken care [of] nicely [in the detention centers].’

In the audio, Melania acknowledges that it’s ‘sad’ the children are not with their parents, before later appearing to imply that some of those seeking asylum often fabricate stories that they’re fleeing gang violence to game the system.

‘A lot of moms and kids, they are teached [sic] how to do it. They go over and they say like, “Oh we will be killed by gang members … It’s so dangerous”. So they’re allowed to stay here’.

Wolkoff told Anderson Cooper Melania wore the infamous ‘I really don’t care, do you’ jacket when she visited a migrant child detention center as a publicity stunt. 

‘It was a publicity stunt, and it was to garner the attention of the press, to make sure that everyone was aware that Melania was going to the border,’ Wolkoff said. 

Part of the motive behind the statement, according to Wolkoff, was for the Trumps to celebrate that they ‘had something over’ Barack and Michelle Obama, neither of whom visited the migrant camps during their time in the White House.

‘They do things not for the purpose that good deeds are done for,’ Wolkoff said. ‘Good deeds are done for the intent of doing good, not for the attention you get for doing good deeds.

‘Unfortunately, this administration and the people around them, and this family, are only doing things that benefit them instead of all of these children and people that are suffering.’ 

In a statement to CNN, Melania’s chief of staff Stephanie Grisham blasted Wolkoff for releasing the recording.

‘Secretly taping the First Lady and willfully breaking an NDA to publish a salacious book is a clear attempt at relevance. The timing of this continues to be suspect – as does this never-ending exercise in self-pity and narcissism,’ Grisham’s comment read.

Wolkoff published her tell-all ‘Melania and Me: The Rise and Fall of my Friendship with the First Lady’ on September 1.

It was revealed last month that  President Donald Trump’s Department of Justice got directly involved in trying to stop Wolkoff from publishing her tell-all.

The Daily Beast reported Wednesday that on July 15, Ethan P. Davis, the acting assistant attorney general of the DOJ’s Civil Division, contacted Wolkoff’s attorney and referenced a non-disclosure agreement Wolkoff had signed for her time spent working on Trump’s 2017 inauguration and serving as a senior adviser to the first lady. 

A week before, The Daily Beast had broken the story that Wolkoff was releasing such a book, teasing it as an ‘explosive’ tell-all before the 2020 election. 

The Trumps’ personal lawyer Marc Kasowitz quickly got involved sending a letter to Wolkoff and her publisher, Simon & Schuster, on July 8 – a day after The Daily Beast’s scoop ran. 

The letter said the book breached the confidentiality clause in a ‘Gratuitous Services Agreement’ between Wolkoff and the first lady, which was signed on August 22, 2017.   

‘The Services Agreement prohibits Ms. Wolkoff from, among other things, disclosing her work for FLOTUS and the White House Office of the First Lady, as well as any information furnished to [her] by the Government under this Agreement, information about the First Family, or any other information about which [she] may become aware during the course of her performance,’ the letter states, according to The Daily Beast. 

The former FLOTUS aide’s attorneys called Kasowitz’s claims ‘unfounded and meritless’ and argued that the Gratuitous Services Agreement did not apply two years later.  

A week later, the DOJ sent Wolkoff’s lawyers a similar letter. 

‘If these reports are true, the book appears to contain government information that Ms. Wolkoff expressly promised to not disclose,’ the letter penned by Davis said. 

‘Please confirm immediately, but no later than July 17, that Ms. Wolkoff’s book will not contain any information covered by the agreement,’ it continued. ‘If you are unable to do so, the government will pursue all available legal remedies.’  

A DOJ spokesperson did not return The Daily Beast’s request for comment  on whether ‘legal remedies’ were pursued. 

Bradley Moss, a national security lawyer interviewed by The Daily Beast, explained that, ‘If this concerned an agreement she signed with the government for work she performed for the Office of the First Lady, then there is nothing improper with DOJ reminding her of the terms of that agreement.’  

‘However, you really have to wonder if DOJ really has nothing better to do with its time,’ Moss sadi.  

A spokesperson for the first lady did not respond to DailyMail.com’s request for comment.    

 This is a developing story…